Latest Posts › Photography Forums › The Shark Tank Feedback Forum › Taking a Break
- This topic has 9 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1mo, 2wk ago by
bucweeet.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
April 9, 2026 at 9:25 pm #548213
It’s been a while since I’ve put one in here…
Looking forward to hear the thoughts.

-
April 9, 2026 at 10:02 pm #548215
Rob Wood (Admin)Keymaster- https://instagram.com/lightstalking
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/lightstalking
- Allows Edits: Yes
@admin-2- Posts:16537
Allows Edits? YesI like this, and I think it’s pertinent because I only just finished writing an article on minimalist landscape photography about half an hour ago.
And I think this one works really well. The blue colour of the ice draws the eye immediately against the more plain foreground and background. The irregular shape of the ice contrasts nicely with the well-placed horizontal horizon. The bird on top of the ice is almost perfectly placed (you really need to look at this one bigger). And all up I would say this execution is extremely good. If I were to have one quibble, it would be to include very slightly more foreground but I think this is an excellent example of the minimalist genre. Nice one.
-
April 10, 2026 at 10:07 pm #548232
Thank you, Rob @admin-2
I’m always torn with indecision about adding foreground in this instance. As the only thing that was there was more water.
But after thinking about it… I understand what you are saying… and I think having the ice a little higher in the image with a little bit more water below, would add to the isolation of the iceberg from the bottom of the frame.
Thanx for the help.
-
April 12, 2026 at 11:18 pm #548301
Rob Wood (Admin)Keymaster- https://instagram.com/lightstalking
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/lightstalking
- Allows Edits: Yes
@admin-2- Posts:16537
Allows Edits? YesLooking at it again, one thing I might add is sharpness around the edge of the iceberg as that would also contrast with the softness of the surrounding area and the horizon.
-
April 18, 2026 at 9:01 pm #548536
Thanx, Rob. @admin with the software I use, it would be pretty easy to apply
-
-
April 11, 2026 at 11:05 am #548242
Robert AppleModerator- https://www.instagram.com/robert.apple.98/
- https://photography667a.myportfolio.com/
- Allows Edits: Yes
@robertapple- Posts:11251
Allows Edits? YesFor myself, even with the bird, I’m a bit lost for a sense of scale, I thought I saw boats in the fog, and realized how dirty my screen was. I agree with Rob on the foreground. The lack of color on the water is messing with my brain , though I have seen scenes like this.
-
April 12, 2026 at 9:33 pm #548290
Thanx Robert. It was a ‘grey day’ and I think that affected the water colour. But the water itself, was pretty grey. @robertapple
-
April 12, 2026 at 11:08 am #548274
LightandShadowParticipant- https://www.flickr.com/people/photos_by_steve/
- Allows Edits: Yes
@lightandshadow- Posts:914
No Achievements Yet!
Allows Edits? YesI see a crouching creature, ready to pounce. I do very much like it. I might have wished for slightly more water in the foreground. I also might have found a slow shutter speed to smooth out the minor ripples in the water appealing.
Or, maybe not. My ideas often fail to deliver what I was sure of before I actually did them.
-
April 12, 2026 at 9:36 pm #548291
Thank you LandS. After looking at my crop with a more critical eye, I agree with more water in the foreground. As for the slower shutter speed, it never occurred to me as we were sailing past the iceberg. It’s something that I’ll have to keep in the back of my mind though. @lightandshadow
-
April 13, 2026 at 8:49 am #548319
LightandShadowParticipant- https://www.flickr.com/people/photos_by_steve/
- Allows Edits: Yes
@lightandshadow- Posts:914
No Achievements Yet!
Allows Edits? YesI doubt that a slow shutter speed would have worked from the ship as it moved by. I often do a “doh” when reviewing my images once I get home as well.
-
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
