Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I was commenting on the original, sorry Im new in here too š In the last photo I think I would have still reduced the amount of sky somewhat…and brought out some detail in the bushes in the foreground.
I agree Im not sure the boat adds to the picture, and its angle seems to jar a little with me. Try without….
As for the blown out highlights if they are totally blown you can’t get them back. If its a RAW file you big get something back but if its totally gone its gone.For me its over saturated, possibly could have changed the white balance or tones down the florescent orange.
I also feel there is a little too much sea at the bottom which means the composition is a little too centred…so the picture could use some cropping.
The interesting focus of the photo is the dome, maybe there could have been a way to bring the dome out as the focus of the picture a little more.
I feel bad critquing others š Not personal I promise !
A little dark and a loss of detail in the left hand side. For me there is no zing to the photo, but thats a personal taste. Needs a little cropping since as it stands there is no focal point in the image.
Could do with some sharpening also to bring out some texture and detail in the string etc
Its OK but you say its of an interesting building. I can’t really see the building and you need to get in closer, show what is interesting about the building….less is more. The interestingness has been lost in my opinion.
There is too much sky, its nice to have negative space but in this case there is too much, its a photo of an ‘interesting’ building yet once again the interestingness is lost. I feel the standard rule of 1/3 has been followed to religiously.
I see you adjusted the exposure and contrast later so thats good…
