- May 31, 2019 at 6:57 pm #408711
- May 31, 2019 at 10:14 pm #408718
The eye is nice and sharp. Overall I feel there’s too much tree and not enough animal. I suggest cropping although I’m not sure if it will be effective after that, because the bottom half of his face is hiddedn behind a branch.
- June 1, 2019 at 1:56 am #408758
As noted, most of it’s face is blocked by the branches. If the face had been in front of the branches, you would have had a winner…
- June 1, 2019 at 3:53 am #408766
Cute little fellow. As the others said, his face is mostly covered by the branches which spoil the image. Nasty little fellows, animals. They never listen to your directions….
- June 1, 2019 at 5:17 am #408768
The image really has a great feel. I agree with others about having the animal’s face more in the image. Shooting by moving further to the left would have helped, but then the animal would have moved away sometimes. We never know. Other than that, the composition and other details look very good in my opinion 🙂
- June 1, 2019 at 7:42 am #408781
I agree with everyone but in a blind 12 ft away its hard. Plus any further to the left I would have to deal with Bulls and at my age that is not going to happen since I was right on the fence line. LOL
- June 1, 2019 at 8:07 am #408782
- June 2, 2019 at 3:04 pm #408952
Yes. This (the second shot) is THE ONE.
- June 2, 2019 at 3:41 pm #408953
- June 3, 2019 at 12:13 pm #409152
Having that first image as part of a group of images of the same fox would be fine, but not so much as a stand alone wildlife photo. Wow, I would like to see an animal that close and apparently not shy. That must have been an exciting moment. Second image …great!
1/200 was the right speed to stop any motion.
- June 3, 2019 at 12:38 pm #409159
Love the second image a lot 🙂
- June 6, 2019 at 7:29 pm #409761
The second one by light miles. Beautiful shot with amazing detail. Too good for ST as cannot suggest any improvement.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.